Our Temasek Geometric Expected Return Model, or T-GEM, simulates the range of possible returns for our portfolio over the next 20 years. These simulations do not predict actual outcomes.
Jump to
(for year ended 31 March)
Equity returns are volatile over time, and influenced by macroeconomic or geopolitical events and shocks. Hence, T-GEM uses a scenario-based approach to simulate our 20-year long term expected returns. This approach takes into account our views of long term macroeconomic fundamentals over the next 20 years, adjusted for current market valuations.
In projecting economic fundamentals, we make more granular year-to-year assumptions for the first five years, and transition to more general assumptions based on longer term fundamentals as we go beyond 10 years. This “pathing” approach incorporates assumptions about changes in economic conditions over time. We do not assume an equilibrium return that remains unchanged over the 20-year period, nor do we assume a reversion to the historical mean.
The charts below illustrate the simulated returns for a Global Bond Portfolio, a Global Equity Portfolio, and the Temasek Portfolio. The simulations are based on our Central Scenario.
The Global Bond Portfolio has the lowest upside potential, as compared to the Global Equity and Temasek Portfolios. It also has the least volatility, as shown by its narrower year-to-year annual returns distribution curve.
The Temasek Portfolio has the highest upside potential (see blue shaded) at the end of the 20-year period, but also the highest volatility.
(as at 31 March 2023)
(as at 31 March 2023)
We simulate our 20-year expected returns under different scenarios.
Potential Scenarios | Description |
---|---|
Central (Our most likely scenario) |
Our baseline expectations of growth and inflation, that also include longer term challenges such as climate change as well as high and rising geopolitical tensions. |
Differing Climate Change Pathways (Less likely scenarios) |
Our “High Ambition” scenario assumes greater mitigation efforts to slow the rise in temperatures. Our “Low Ambition” scenario assumes no further mitigation efforts, which results in a disastrously steep rise in temperatures by 2100. |
Major Escalation of Global Strategic Rivalry (Less likely scenario) |
A significant intensification of tensions between the global superpowers accelerates bifurcation across various economic blocs. This would result in a global stagflationary environment amidst structurally lower levels of productivity and economic growth (from reduced trade and investment), with elevated prices as global supply chains remain constrained. |
The T-GEM 20-year returns curves for the Temasek Portfolio are shown below for the Central, Differing Climate Change Pathways, and Major Escalation of Global Strategic Rivalry Scenarios.
Broadly, the Central Scenario offers higher 20-year expected returns for the Temasek Portfolio, compared to those under the other alternate scenarios. The exception is the High Ambition Climate Change Scenario, where there is concerted effort and strong actions to mitigate climate change and carbon emissions, for a more liveable world.
(as at 31 March 2023)
(as at 31 March 2023)
The four charts below show the positive impact of the High Ambition Climate Change Scenario on the 20-year returns in the four key markets of the US, the Eurozone, China, and Singapore. These markets make up 74% of Temasek’s underlying portfolio exposure as at 31 March 2023, and will consequently also drive higher 20-year returns for Temasek. However, the associated transition costs may slightly depress returns over the next decade or so, as a medium term trade-off.
(as at 31 March 2023)
(as at 31 March 2023)
(as at 31 March 2023)
(as at 31 March 2023)
A High Ambition Climate Change agenda will not only deliver environmental and social benefits. Our T-GEM model highlights that the High Ambition scenario is compatible with our aim of doing well, doing right, and doing good, to deliver better and more sustainable returns over the longer term horizon even as we benefit people and planet with ambitious carbon abatement actions.
In contrast, the Low Ambition scenario of no further mitigation efforts will result in huge irreversible damages which will depress longer term returns in all markets.